Who is responsible for making sure the patient information was identified on the specimen collection

1. Ford Catching ID errors where it counts---in the lab. CAP Today. 2005;19(9):34–40. [Google Scholar]

2. Sauer DMC, Boshkov L. Errors in transfusion medicine. Lab Med. 2001;4(32):205–7. 4(32):205-7. 2001;4(32):205-7. [Google Scholar]

3. Jones BA, Calam RR, Howanitz PJ. Chemistry specimen acceptability: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 453 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121(1):19–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Dale JC, Novis DA. Outpatient phlebotomy success and reasons for specimen rejection. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126(4):416–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Ford Disabling mislabeling---solutions for blood banks. CAP Today. 29(11):62–64. 2009;23(1):5-8. [Google Scholar]

6. Christenson RH, Snyder SR, Shaw CS, Derzon JH, Black RS, Mass D, et al. Laboratory medicine best practices: systematic evidence review and evaluation methods for quality improvement. Clin Chem. 2011;57(6):816–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Snyder SR, Favoretto AM, Derzon JH, Christenson RH, Kahn SE, Shaw CS, et al. Effectiveness of barcoding for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem. 2012;45(13–14):988–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Ford Mislabeling, wrong-blood-in-tube errors rare but there. CAP Today. 2015;29(11):62–64. [Google Scholar]

9. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21794/improving-diagnosis-in-health-care. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Price CPLJ, Christenson RH, editors. Applying evidence-based laboratory medicine: a step-by-step guide. Washington (DC): AACC; 2009. [Google Scholar]

11. Forsberg SA. Infant metabolic screening: a total quality management approach. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26(3):257–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Quillen K, Murphy K. Quality improvement to decrease specimen mislabeling in transfusion medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130(8):1196–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Wagar EA, Tamashiro L, Yasin B, Hilborne L, Bruckner DA. Patient safety in the clinical laboratory: a longitudinal analysis of specimen identification errors. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2006;130(11):1662–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Wagar EA, Stankovic AK, Raab S, Nakhleh RE, Walsh MK. Specimen labeling errors: a Q-probes analysis of 147 clinical laboratories. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2008;132(10):1617–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. O'Neill E, Richardson-Weber L, McCormack G, Uhl L, Haspel RL. Strict adherence to a blood bank specimen labeling policy by all clinical laboratories significantly reduces the incidence of "wrong blood in tube". Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132(2):164–8. quiz 306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Shetterly M, Charney F. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority blood specimen labeling collaborative. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2011;31(2):31–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Rees S, Stevens L, Mikelsons D, Quam E, Darcy T. Reducing specimen identification errors. J Nurs Care Qual. 2012;27(3):253–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Kim JK, Dotson B, Thomas S, Nelson KC. Standardized patient identification and specimen labeling: a retrospective analysis on improving patient safety. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(1):53–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Seferian EG, Jamal S, Clark K, Cirricione M, Burnes-Bolton L, Amin M, et al. A multidisciplinary, multifaceted improvement initiative to eliminate mislabelled laboratory specimens at a large tertiary care hospital. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2014;23(8):690–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Zervakis OR Specimen Labeling. AORN. 2016;103(2):164–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Agarwal R, Chaturvedi S, Chhillar N, Goyal R, Pant I, Tripathi CB. Role of intervention on laboratory performance: evaluation of quality indicators in a tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2012;27(1):61–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Gonzalez-Porras JR, Graciani IF, Alvarez M, Pinto J, Conde MP, Nieto MJ, et al. Tubes for pretransfusion testing should be collected by blood bank staff and hand labelled until the implementation of new technology for improved sample labelling. Results of a prospective study. Vox Sang. 2008;95(1):52–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. [accessed 15 Aug 2013];Commission. 2013 http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/NPSG_Chapter_Jan2013_HAP.pdf.

24. World Health Organisation. Patient Safety Solutions, Volume 1 AND Solution 2. Geneva: WHO; 2007. Patient Identification. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/solutions/patientsafety/PS-Solution2.pdf. [Google Scholar]

25. Lumadue JA, Boyd JS, Ness PM. Adherence to a strict specimen-labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens. Transfusion. 1997;37(11–12):1169–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Tondon R, Pandey P, Mickey KB, Chaudhary R. Errors reported in cross match laboratory: a prospective data analysis. Transfus Apher Sci. 2010;43(3):309–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Howanitz PJ, Renner SW, Walsh MK. Continuous wristband monitoring over 2 years decreases identification errors: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks Study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126(7):809–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. van den Akker T, Mwagomba B, Irlam J, van Roosmalen J. Using audits to reduce the incidence of uterine rupture in a Malawian district hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(3):289–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Kotagal M, Lee P, Habiyakare C, Dusabe R, Kanama P, Epino HM, et al. Improving quality in resource poor settings: observational study from rural Rwanda. Bmj. 2009;339:b3488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Cottrell S, Watson D, Eyre TA, Brunskill SJ, Doree C, Murphy MF. Interventions to reduce wrong blood in tube errors in transfusion: a systematic review. Transfus Med Rev. 2013;27(4):197–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Varey A, Tinegate H, Robertson J, Watson D, Iqbal A. Factors predisposing to wrong blood in tube incidents: a year's experience in the North East of England. Transfus Med. 2013;23(5):321–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Mallika V. Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(1):63–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Bhat V, Tiwari M, Chavan P, Kelkar R. Analysis of laboratory sample rejections in the pre-analytical stage at an oncology center. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(15–16):1203–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


Page 2

Improved Communication and Collaboration between Laboratory and Healthcare Professionals by Formation of Multidisciplinary Teams Interventions: Overall Practices

Studies (Published)Study Quality RatingEffect Size Rating
Zervakis, 2015GoodModerate
Seferian, 2014GoodSubstantial
Kim, 2013GoodMinimal
Rees, 2012FairSubstantial
Pa Patient/ Shetterly, 2011FairModerate
O’Neil, 2009FairSubstantial
Foresberg, 1996FairSubstantial
BODY OF EVIDENCE RATINGS1 Good/ Substantial
1 Good/ Moderate
1 Good/ Minimal
1 Fair/ Moderate
3 Fair/ Substantial
CONSISTENCYConsistent
OVERALL STRENGTHModerate