World Health Organization (WHO): Unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. 2011, Geneva: WHO, 6
Google Scholar
Weeks A, Alia G, Blum J, Winikoff B, Ekwaru P, Durocher J, Mirembe F: A randomized trial of misoprostol compared with manual vacuum aspiration for incomplete abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 106 (3): 540-547. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000173799.82687.dc.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Shwekerela B, Kalumuna R, Kipingili R, Mashaka N, Westheimer E, Clark W, Winikoff B: Misoprostol for treatment of incomplete abortion at the regional hospital level: Results from Tanzania. BJOG. 2007, 114 (11): 1363-1367. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01469.x.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Dao B, Blum J, Thieba B, Raghavan S, Ouedraego M, Lankoande J, Winikoff B: Is misoprostol a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to manual vacuum aspiration for post-abortion care? Results from a randomized trial in Burkina Faso, West Africa. BJOG. 2007, 114 (11): 1368-1375. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01468.x.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bique C, Ustá M, Debora B, Chong E, Westheimer E, Winikoff B: Comparison of misoprostol and manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007, 98 (3): 222-226. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.003.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Blum J, Winikoff B, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Ho PC, Schiavon R, Weeks A: Treatment of incomplete abortion and miscarriage with misoprostol. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007, 99 (Suppl 2): S186-S189.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Diop A, Raghavan S, Rakotovao JP, Comendant R, Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B: Two routes of administration for misoprostol in the treatment of incomplete abortion: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception. 2009, 79 (6): 456-462. 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.016.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Dabash R, Ramadan MC, Darwish E, Hassanein N, Blum J, Winikof B: A randomizes controlled trial of 400-μg sublingual misoprostol versus manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete abortion in two Egyptian hospitals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010, 111 (2): 131-135. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.021.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Taylor J, Diop A, Blum J, Dolo O, Winikoff B: Oral misoprostol as an alternative to surgical management for incomplete abortion in Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011, 112 (1): 40-44. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.08.022.
CAS Article PubMed Google Scholar
Akin A, Blum J, Ozalp S, Onderoğlu L, Kirca U, Bilgili N, Koçoğlu G, Philip N, Winikoff B: Results and lessons learned from a small medical abortion clinical study in Turkey. Contraception. 2004, 70 (5): 401-406. 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.05.005.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Akin A, Dabash R, Dilbaz B, Aktün H, Dursun P, Kiran S, Aksan G, Doğan B, Winikoff B: Increasing women’s choices in medical abortion: a study of misoprostol 400 microg swallowed immediately or held sublingually. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009, 14 (3): 169-175. 10.1080/13625180902916020.
Fjerstad M: Figuring out follow-up. Mifematters PPFA/CAPS. 2006, 13: 2-3.
Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Misoprostol for postabortion care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 427. Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 113: 465-468.
Article Google Scholar
World Health Organization: Safe abortion: Technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2012, Geneva: WHO, 2
Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO): WHO model list of essential medicines. 2010, Geneva: WHO, 16
Google Scholar
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/127/prepub
Page 2
Group 1: Misoprostol
Group 2: Surgical
p-value
n = 480
n = 380
Age in years: mean ± SD (range)
28.1 ± 7.2 (13-48)a
28.7 ± 7.3 (14-46)b
0.19
Education level: % (n)
0.63
No education
30.6 (118/385)
28.3 (80/283)
Primary
24.9 (96/385)
23.7 (67/283)
Secondary
30.9 (119/385)
31.1 (88/283)
Tertiary
13.5 (52/385)
17.0 (48/283)
Marital status: % (n)
0.20
Single
11.5 (55/478)
8.3 (31/372)
Married
87.0 (416/478)
90.9 (338/372)
Divorced
1.5 (7/478)
0.8 (3/372)
Parity: mean ± SD (range)
2.1 ± 2.1 (0-11)c
2.3 ± 2.2 (0-11)d
0.09
Abortion type according to provider: % (n)
0.23
Spontaneous
94.0 (440/468)
95.9 (349/364)
Induced
6.0 (28/468)
4.1 (15/364)
* Denominators vary due to response rate for each question.