It is important to monitor and track unintended consequences of health it implementation because:

1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.

2. NHS Magazine. Available at: <http://www.nhs.uk/nhsmagazine/story316.asp>. Accessed Sept 16, 2003.

3. Roughead E. The nature and extent of drug-related hospitalizations in Australia. J Qual Clin Pract. 1999;19:19–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

5. Dick RS, Steen EB, Detmer DE (eds). The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.

6. Bates DW, Pappins E, Kuperman GJ, et al. Using information systems to measure and improve quality. Int J Med Inf. 1999;53:115–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:130–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. van Wijk M, Van der Lei J, Mosseveld M, Bohnen A, van Bemmel JH. Assessment of decision support for blood test ordering in primary care. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:274–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:108–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, Maharry K, Kohler RB, McDonald CJ. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:965–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2741–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:277–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Perrow C. Normal Accidents. Living With High Risk Technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1984.

15. Weizenbaum J. Computer Power and Human Reason. From Judgment to Calculation. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co., 1976.

16. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inf. 2001;64:143–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Tenner E. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1996.

18. Goldstein MK, Hoffman BB, Coleman RW, et al. Patient safety in guideline-based decision support for hypertension management: ATHENA DSS. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(Nov-Dec suppl):S11–6. [Google Scholar]

19. Burnum JF. The misinformation era: the fall of the medical record. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:482–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Berg M, Goorman E. The contextual nature of medical information. Int J Med Inform. 1999;56:51–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center. I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Acad Med. 1993;68:20–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Dykstra R. Computerized physician order entry and communication: reciprocal impacts. AMIA Proc. 2002:230–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

23. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM. Safe but sound: patient safety meets evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2002;88:508–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Effken JA, Carty B. The era of patient safety: implications for nursing informatics curricula. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(suppl):S120–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Weiner M, Gress T, Thiemann DR, et al. Contrasting views of physicians and nurses about an inpatient computer-based provider order-entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:234–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Bates DW, Cohen MS, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:299–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. McNutt RA, Abrams R, Arons DC. Patient safety efforts should focus on medical errors. JAMA. 2002;287:1997–2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Strauss AL. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

29. Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Dykstra R, Fournier L. Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people. Int J Med Inf. 2003;69:235–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Lavelle M, et al. A cross-site qualitative study of physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:188–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Lavelle M, et al. Perceptions of physician order entry: results of a cross-site qualitative study. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:313–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Berg M. Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociol Health Illness. 1996;18:499–524. [Google Scholar]

33. Berg M. Medical work and the computer-based patient record: a sociological perspective. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37:294–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Berg M. Search for synergy: interrelating medical work and patient care information systems. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:337–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Gosling S, Westbrook JI, Coiera EW. Variation in the use of online clinical evidence: a qualitative analysis. Int J Med Inf. 2003;69:1–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wieder C. Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985.

37. Drazen EL, Metzger JB, Ritter JL, Schneider MK. Patient Care Information Systems: Successful Design and Implementation. New York, NY: Springer, 1995.

38. Kaplan B. Objectification and negotiation in interpreting clinical images: implications for computer-based patient records. Artif Intell Med. 1995;7:439–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Kuhn KA, Guise DA. From hospital information systems to health information systems: problems, challenges, perspectives. Methods Inf Med. 2001;40:275–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Forsythe DE. Studying Those Who Study Us. An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.

41. Luff P, Heath C, Greatbatch D. Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen-based documentation in collaborative activity. In Turner J, Kraus R (eds). Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1992, pp 163–70.

42. Coiera E, Jayasuriya R, Hardy J, Bannan A, Thorpe MEC. Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2002;176:415–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Tellioglu H, Wagner I. Work practices surrounding PACS: the politics of space in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2001;10:163–88. [Google Scholar]

44. Patel VL, Kushniruk AW. Understanding, navigating and communicating knowledge: issues and challenges. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37:460–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

46. Garrod S. How groups co-ordinate their concepts and terminology: implications for medical informatics. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37:471–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

48. Faber MG. Design and introduction of an electronic patient record: how to involve users?. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:371–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Suchman L. Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1994;2:21–39. [Google Scholar]

50. Siddiqi J, Shekaran MC. Requirements engineering: the emerging wisdom. IEEE Software. 1996;13:15–9. [Google Scholar]

51. Reddy M, Pratt W, Dourish P, Shabot MM. Sociotechnical requirements analysis for clinical systems. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:437–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

52. Star SL (ed). The Cultures of Computing. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995.

53. Zuboff S. In the Age of the Smart Machine. The Future of Work and Power. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1988.

54. Panzarasa S, Madde S, Quaglini S, Pistarini C, Stefanelli C. Evidence-based careflow management systems: the case of post-stroke rehabilitation. J Biomed Inform. 2002;35:123–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Collins HM. Artificial Experts. Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

56. Hughes D. When nurse knows best: some aspects of nurse/doctor interaction in a casualty department. Sociol Health Illness. 1988;10:1–22. [Google Scholar]

57. Goorman E, Berg M. Modelling nursing activities: electronic patient records and their discontents. Nurs Inquiry. 2000;7:3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Gasser L. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems. 1986;4:205–25. [Google Scholar]

59. Schmidt K, Bannon L. Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1992;1:7–40. [Google Scholar]

60. Gorman PN, Lavelle M, Ash JS. Order creation and communication in healthcare. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:376–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Kilpatrick ES, Holding S. Use of computer terminals on wards to access emergency test results: a retrospective audit. BMJ. 2001;322:1101–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

62. Suchman L. Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

63. Kay S, Purves IN. Medical records and other stories: a narratological framework. Methods Inf Med. 1996;35:72–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

64. Bardram J. Temporal coordination: on time and coordination of collaborative activities at a surgical department. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2000;9:157–87. [Google Scholar]

65. Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Sharpe M. Making a case in medical work: implications for the electronic medical record. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2004. In press.

66. Svenningsen S. Electronic Patient Records and Medical Practice. Reorganization of Roles, Responsibilities, and Risks. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Thesis, 2002.

67. Kling R (ed). Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1996.

68. Turkle S. The Second Self: The Human Spirit in a Computer Culture. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1984.

69. Leveson NG, Turner CS. An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. Computer. 1993;July:18–41. [Google Scholar]

70. Tsai TL, Fridsma DB, Gatti G. Computer decision support as a source of interpretation error: the case of electrocardiograms. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:478–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

71. Miller RA, Gardner RM. Summary recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:842–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

72. Miller RA, Gardner RM. Recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:442–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

73. Brown JS, Duguid P. The Social Life of Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.

74. Lave J. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

75. Ash J, Berg M. Report of conference track 4: socio-technical issues of HIS. Methods Inf Med. 2003;69:305–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]