Which term is used to describe when something is interpreted depending on personal views experience and background?

1. Cambridge Online Dictionary. 2019. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/research. Accessed 24 Feb 2019, Research.

2. Bynum W, Artino A, Uijtdehaage S, Webb A, Varpio L. Sentinel emotional events. The nature, triggers, and effects of shame experiences in medical residents. Acad Med. 2018 doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002479. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Hooker C. Understanding empathy: why phenomenology and hermeneutics can help medical education and practice. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;2015(18):541–552. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9631-z. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Patel RS, Tarrant C, Bonas S, Shaw RL. Medical students’ personal experience of high-stakes failure: case studies using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Bmc Med Educ. 2015;15:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0371-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Ajjawi R, Higgs J. Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. Qual Rep. 2007;12:612:38. [Google Scholar]

6. Teherani A, Martimianakis T, Stenfors-Hayes T, Wadhwa A, Varpio L. Choosing a qualitative research approach. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7:669–670. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00414.1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Contributions to phenomenology. In: Embree L, editor. Encyclopedia of phenomenology. Vol. 18. Netherlands: Springer; 1997.

8. Ashworth P. An approach to phenomenological psychology: the contingencies of the lifeworld. J Phenom Psychol. 2003;34:145–156. doi: 10.1163/156916203322847119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Vagle M. Crafting phenomenological research. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 2018. [Google Scholar]

10. Tuffour I. A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: a contemporary qualitative research approach. J Healthc Commun. 2017;2(4:52):1–5. [Google Scholar]

11. Smith, David Woodruff. Phenomenology. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/. Accessed 9 Oct 2018.

12. Manen MV. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 1997. [Google Scholar]

13. Laverty SM. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2003;2:1–29. doi: 10.1177/160940690300200303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Kafle NP. Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified. Bodhi: Interdiscip J. 2011;5:181–182. [Google Scholar]

15. Jones WT. The twentieth century to Wittgenstein and Sartre. San Francisco, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1975. [Google Scholar]

16. Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. Milton Park: Routledge; 2000. [Google Scholar]

17. Staiti A. The pedagogic impulse of Husserl’s ways into transcendental phenomenology: an alternative reading of the Erste Philosophie lecture. Grad Fac Philos J. 2012;33:39–56. doi: 10.5840/gfpj20123313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Moustakas CE. Phenomenological research methods. 1. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1994. [Google Scholar]

19. Husserl E. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. 1. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970. [Google Scholar]

20. Barua A. Husserl, Heidegger, and the transcendental dimension of phenomenology. Indo-Pacific J Phenomenol. 2015;7:1–10. doi: 10.1080/20797222.2007.11433942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Reiners GM. Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. J Nurs Care. 2012;1:1–3. [Google Scholar]

22. Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:726–735. doi: 10.1177/1049732304263638. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Davidsen AS. Phenomenological approaches in psychology and health sciences. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;10:318–339. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2011.608466. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Presuppose Nothing AP. The suspension of assumptions in phenomenological psychological methodology. J Phenomenol Psychol. 1996;27:1–25. [Google Scholar]

25. Gill MJ. The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2014;17:118–137. doi: 10.1177/1094428113518348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Colaizzi P. Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford, UK: Open University Press; 1978. [Google Scholar]

27. Giorgi A. Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]

28. Polkinghorne DE. Phenomenological research methods. In: Valle RS, Halling S, editors. Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: exploring the breadth of human experience. New York: Springer; 1989. pp. 41–60. [Google Scholar]

29. Varpio L, Martimianakis T, Mylopoulos M. Qualitative research methodologies: embracing methodological borrowing, shifting, and importing. In: Durning SJ, Cleland J, editors. Researching medical education. 1. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. pp. 245–255. [Google Scholar]

30. Arksey H, Knight PT. Interviewing for social scientists. London: SAGE; 1999. [Google Scholar]

31. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1802–1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Medical students’ understanding of empathy: a phenomenological study. Med Educ. 2012;46:306–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04152.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Neumann M, Edelhauser F, Tauschel D, et al. Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med. 2011;86:996–1009. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318221e615. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med. 2012;87:1243–1249. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fbf. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Bynum W, Varpio L. When I say … hermeneutic phenomenology. Med Educ. 2018;52:252–253. doi: 10.1111/medu.13414. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Enos T, editor. Encyclopedia of rhetoric and composition. New York: Routledge; 2010. [Google Scholar]

37. Heidegger M. Being and time. Blackwell: Oxford UK and Cambridge USA; 1867. [Google Scholar]

38. Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY; 1990. [Google Scholar]

39. Van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc; 2014. [Google Scholar]

40. Grondin J. Gadamer’s basic understanding of understanding. In: Dostal RJ, editor. The cambridge companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 36–51. [Google Scholar]

41. Polkinghorne D. Methodology for the human sciences. Albany: SUNY; 1983. [Google Scholar]

Page 2

Comparison of transcendental and hermeneutic phenomenology