A central line (or central venous catheter) is like an intravenous (IV) line. But it is much longer than a regular IV and goes all the way up to a vein near the heart or just inside the heart.
A patient can get medicine, fluids, blood, or nutrition through a central line. It also can be used to draw blood.
What Are the Types of Central Lines?
Commonly used central lines include:
When Are Central Lines Used Instead of Regular IV Lines?
Doctors might use a central line instead of a regular IV line because:
- It can stay in place longer (up to a year or even more).
- It makes it easier to draw blood.
- Patients can get large amounts of fluids or medicines (like chemotherapy) that might not go through regular IVs.
Doctors may place a central line for someone who:
- has a serious infection so they can get IV for a few weeks
- has cancer so they can get chemotherapy and blood tests through the line
- needs IV nutrition
- will need many blood transfusions
Most of the time, central lines do not cause any problems. If problems do happen, it is usually because the line gets infected or stops working. Very rarely, a central line can cause a blood clot. Doctors review the risks with families before placing the central line.
How Can Parents Help?
If your child has a central line, you can help care for it to prevent infection and keep it working well. It's normal to feel a little bit nervous caring for the central line at first, but soon you'll feel more comfortable. You'll get supplies to use at home, and a visiting nurse may come to help you when you first get home.
Before your child goes home from having the central line placed, ask your health care team:
- how often to change the dressing
- when and how to flush the line
- what to do if the line gets blocked or comes out
- how to give medicines through the central line (if you will be giving medicines at home)
- if the line has caps, how often to change them
- which physical activities are OK for your child (most kids need to avoid rough play and contact sports)
- if any special care is needed to protect the central line while your child bathes
- what signs of infection to watch for
Tell your child's teachers, school nurse, counselor, and physical education teacher about the central line. They can make sure your child avoids any activities that may damage the line, and help support your child during treatment.
Khatri N, Misra A. Applications of polymers in parenteral drug delivery. In: Misra A, Shahiwala A, editors. Applications of polymers in drug delivery. Shrewsbury: Smithers Rapra; 2014.
Google Scholar
Development of paediatric medicines: points to consider in formulation annex 5. WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. p. 1–29.
Pein M, Preis M, Eckert C, Kiene FE. Taste-masking assessment of solid oral dosage forms—a critical review. Int J Pharm. 2014;465(1–2):239–54.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maniruzzaman M, Boateng JS, Chowdhry BZ, Snowden MJ, Douroumis D. A review on the taste masking of bitter APIs: hot-melt extrusion (HME) evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;40(2):145–56.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Papai K, Budai M, Ludanyi K, Antal I, Klebovich I. In vitro food–drug interaction study: which milk component has a decreasing effect on the bioavailability of ciprofloxacin? J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;52(1):37–42.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Knippa A. PN nursing care of children. Stilwell (KS): Assessment Technologies Institute; 2011.
Google Scholar
Klingmann V. Acceptability testing of minitablets from neonates to pre-school children. 6th European Paediatric Formulation Initiative Conference; 17–18 Sep 2014; Athens.
Avery GB, Randolph JG, Weaver T. Gastric acidity in the first day of life. Pediatrics. 1966;37(6):1005–7.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tayman C, Rayyan M, Allegaert K. Neonatal pharmacology: extensive interindividual variability despite limited size. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2011;16(3):170–84.
PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Alcorn J, McNamara PJ. Pharmacokinetics in the newborn. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(5):667–86.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology: drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(12):1157–67.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bartelink IH, Rademaker CM, Schobben AF, van den Anker JN. Guidelines on paediatric dosing on the basis of developmental physiology and pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(11):1077–97.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marsot A, Brevaut-Malaty V, Vialet R, Boulamery A, Bruguerolle B, Simon N. Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of phenobarbital in neonates and young infants: a population pharmacokinetic modelling approach. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2014;28(4):465–71.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Silverio J, Poole JW. Serum concentrations of ampicillin in newborn infants after oral administration. Pediatrics. 1973;51(3):578–80.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koren G. Therapeutic drug monitoring principles in the neonate. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. Clin Chem. 1997;43(1):222–7.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carlos MA, Babyn PS, Marcon MA, Moore AM. Changes in gastric emptying in early postnatal life. J Pediatr. 1997;130(6):931–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Czinn SJ, Blanchard S. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in neonates and infants: when and how to treat. Paediatr Drugs. 2013;15(1):19–27.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hillemeier AC, Lange R, McCallum R, Seashore J, Gryboski J. Delayed gastric emptying in infants with gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr. 1981;98(2):190–3.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martinussen M, Brubakk AM, Linker DT, Vik T, Yao AC. Mesenteric blood flow velocity and its relation to circulatory adaptation during the first week of life in healthy term infants. Pediatr Res. 1994;36(3):334–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martinussen M, Brubakk AM, Vik T, Yao AC. Mesenteric blood flow velocity and its relation to transitional circulatory adaptation in appropriate for gestational age preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 1996;39(2):275–80.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nankervis CA, Giannone PJ, Reber KM. The neonatal intestinal vasculature: contributing factors to necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(2):83–91.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Reber KM, Mager GM, Miller CE, Nowicki PT. Relationship between flow rate and NO production in postnatal mesenteric arteries. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(1):G43–50.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nankervis CA, Nowicki PT. Role of nitric oxide in regulation of vascular resistance in postnatal intestine. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(6 Pt 1):G949–58.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Reed MD. The ontogeny of drug disposition: focus on drug absorption, distribution, and excretion. Drug Inf J. 1996;30:1129–34.
Google Scholar
Shankaran S, Kauffman RE. Use of chloramphenicol palmitate in neonates. J Pediatr. 1984;105(1):113–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Acocella G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of rifampicin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1978;3(2):108–27.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hill JM, Maloney A, Stephens K, Adrezin RS, Eisenfeld L. Stethoscope for monitoring neonatal abdominal sounds. Int J Mod Eng. 2008;9(1):5.
Google Scholar
Dumas J, Hill KM, Adrezin RS, et al. Feasibility of an electronic stethoscope system for monitoring neonatal bowel sounds. Conn Med. 2013;77(8):467–71.
PubMed Google Scholar
van Kalken CK, Giaccone G, van der Valk P, et al. Multidrug resistance gene (P-glycoprotein) expression in the human fetus. Am J Pathol. 1992;141(5):1063–72.
PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Boucher FD, Modlin JF, Weller S, et al. Phase I evaluation of zidovudine administered to infants exposed at birth to the human immunodeficiency virus. J Pediatr. 1993;122(1):137–44.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Capparelli EV, Mirochnick M, Dankner WM, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of zidovudine in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2003;142(1):47–52.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wu CY, Benet LZ, Hebert MF, et al. Differentiation of absorption and first-pass gut and hepatic metabolism in humans: studies with cyclosporine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995;58(5):492–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Paine MF, Shen DD, Kunze KL, et al. First-pass metabolism of midazolam by the human intestine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996;60(1):14–24.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ince I, Knibbe CA, Danhof M, de Wildt SN. Developmental changes in the expression and function of cytochrome P450 3A isoforms: evidence from in vitro and in vivo investigations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52(5):333–45.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
de Wildt SN, Kearns GL, Hop WC, Murry DJ, Abdel-Rahman SM, van den Anker JN. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of oral midazolam in preterm infants. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53(4):390–2.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Pacifici GM. Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in neonates and children: effect of disease-a review. Int J Pediatr. 2014;2014:309342.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Gritz EC, Bhandari V. The human neonatal gut microbiome: a brief review. Front Pediatr. 2015;3:17.
PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(237):237ra65.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Adlerberth I, Wold AE. Establishment of the gut microbiota in Western infants. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(2):229–38.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scholtens PA, Oozeer R, Martin R, Amor KB, Knol J. The early settlers: intestinal microbiology in early life. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012;3:425–47.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stewart CJ, Marrs EC, Nelson A, et al. Development of the preterm gut microbiome in twins at risk of necrotising enterocolitis and sepsis. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e73465.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peppercorn MA, Goldman P. The role of intestinal bacteria in the metabolism of salicylazosulfapyridine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1972;181(3):555–62.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saha JR, Butler VP Jr, Neu HC, Lindenbaum J. Digoxin-inactivating bacteria: identification in human gut flora. Science. 1983;220(4594):325–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lindenbaum J, Rund DG, Butler VP Jr, Tse-Eng D, Saha JR. Inactivation of digoxin by the gut flora: reversal by antibiotic therapy. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(14):789–94.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carmody RN, Turnbaugh PJ. Host–microbial interactions in the metabolism of therapeutic and diet-derived xenobiotics. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(10):4173–81.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Broussard L. Small size, big risk: preventing neonatal and pediatric medication errors. Nurs Womens Health. 2010;14(5):405–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
D’Antonio YC, Cohen MR. Pediatric medication errors. In: Cohen MR, editor. Medication errors: causes, prevention, and risk management. Sudbury (MA): Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc.; 1999.
Google Scholar
Lass J, Naelapaa K, Shah U, et al. Hospitalised neonates in Estonia commonly receive potentially harmful excipients. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:136.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Allegaert K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Kulo A, et al. Prospective assessment of short-term propylene glycol tolerance in neonates. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(12):1054–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Salunke S, Brandys B, Giacoia G, Tuleu C. The STEP (Safety and Toxicity of Excipients for Paediatrics) database: part 2—the pilot version. Int J Pharm. 2013;457(1):310–22.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Turner MA, Duncan J, Shah U, et al. European study of neonatal exposure to excipients: an update. Int J Pharm. 2013;457(1):357–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stiers JL, Ward RM. Newborns, one of the last therapeutic orphans to be adopted. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(2):106–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Usher R, Shephard M, Lind J. The blood volume of the newborn infant and placental transfusion. Acta Paediatr. 1963;52:497–512.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sherwin CM, Medlicott NJ, Reith DM, Broadbent RS. Intravenous drug delivery in neonates: lessons learnt. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(6):590–4.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Sherwin CM, McCaffrey F, Broadbent RS, Reith DM, Medlicott NJ. Discrepancies between predicted and observed rates of intravenous gentamicin delivery for neonates. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009;61(4):465–71.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Medlicott NJ, Reith DM, McCaffrey F, Krittaphol W, Broadbent RS. Delayed delivery of intravenous gentamicin in neonates: impact of infusion variables. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65(3):370–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Colacchio K, Deng Y, Northrup V, Bizzarro MJ. Complications associated with central and non-central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2012;32(12):941–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Katheria AC, Fleming SE, Kim JH. A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheters compared with standard radiograph in neonates. J Perinatol. 2013;33(10):791–4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Panagiotounakou P, Antonogeorgos G, Gounari E, Papadakis S, Labadaridis J, Gounaris AK. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: frequency of complications in premature newborn depends on the insertion site. J Perinatol. 2014;34(6):461–3.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bradley JS, Wassel RT, Lee L, Nambiar S. Intravenous ceftriaxone and calcium in the neonate: assessing the risk for cardiopulmonary adverse events. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):e609–13.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Evans C, Dixon A. Intravenous therapy: practice issues. Infant. 2006;2(4):133–6.
Google Scholar
Robinson CA, Sawyer JE. Y-site compatibility of medications with parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2009;14(1):48–56.
PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Kenner C, Lott JW. Comprehensive neonatal care: an interdisciplinary approach. 4th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
Google Scholar
Jew RK, Owen D, Kaufman D, Balmer D. Osmolality of commonly used medications and formulas in the neonatal intensive care unit. Nutr Clin Pract. 1997;12(4):158–63.
Article Google Scholar
Alade SL, Brown RE, Paquet A Jr. Polysorbate 80 and E-Ferol toxicity. Pediatrics. 1986;77(4):593–7.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gershanik J, Boecler B, Ensley H, McCloskey S, George W. The gasping syndrome and benzyl alcohol poisoning. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(22):1384–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ward RM, Kern SE. Clinical trials in neonates: a therapeutic imperative. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(6):585–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Uppal N, Yasseen B, Seto W, Parshuram CS. Drug formulations that require less than 0.1 mL of stock solution to prepare doses for infants and children. CMAJ. 2011;183(4):E246–8.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Strolin Benedetti M, Baltes EL. Drug metabolism and disposition in children. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2003;17(3):281–99.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. General recommendations on immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011;60(RR2):1–64.
Google Scholar
Khambalia AZ, Roberts CL, Bowen JR, Nassar N. Maternal and infant characteristics by mode of vitamin K prophylaxis administration. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(8):665–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ipema HJ. Use of oral vitamin K for prevention of late vitamin k deficiency bleeding in neonates when injectable vitamin K is not available. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46(6):879–83.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bellieni CV, Aloisi AM, Ceccarelli D, et al. Intramuscular injections in newborns: analgesic treatment and sex-linked response. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(4):419–22.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Patel IH, Weinfeld RE, Konikoff J, Parsonnet M. Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of ceftriaxone in humans after single-dose intramuscular administration in water and lidocaine diluents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;21(6):957–62.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Powell KR, Mawhorter SD. Outpatient treatment of serious infections in infants and children with ceftriaxone. J Pediatr. 1987;110(6):898–901.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shah VS, Taddio A, Hancock R, Shah P, Ohlsson A. Topical amethocaine gel 4% for intramuscular injection in term neonates: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Ther. 2008;30(1):166–74.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liaw JJ, Zeng WP, Yang L, Yuh YS, Yin T, Yang MH. Nonnutritive sucking and oral sucrose relieve neonatal pain during intramuscular injection of hepatitis vaccine. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;42(6):918–30.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hensel D, Morson GL, Preuss EA. Best practices in newborn injections. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013;38(3):163–7 (quiz 168–169).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ohls RK, Ehrenkranz RA, Wright LL, et al. Effects of early erythropoietin therapy on the transfusion requirements of preterm infants below 1250 grams birth weight: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2001;108(4):934–42.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Costa S, Romagnoli C, Zuppa AA, et al. How to administrate erythropoietin, intravenous or subcutaneous? Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(6):579–83.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ghadially R, Shear NH. Topical therapy and percutaneous absorption. In: Fletcher J, editor. Pediatric pharmacology: therapeutic principles in practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1992. p. 72–7.
Google Scholar
Choonara I. Percutaneous drug absorption and administration. Arch Dis Child. 1994;71(2):F73–4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kearns GL. Impact of developmental pharmacology on pediatric study design: overcoming the challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106(3 Suppl):S128–38.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
West DP, Worobec S, Solomon LM. Pharmacology and toxicology of infant skin. J Investig Dermatol. 1981;76(3):147–50.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Powell H, Swarner O, Gluck L, Lampert P. Hexachlorophene myelinopathy in premature infants. J Pediatr. 1973;82(6):976–81.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dilly SA. Scanning electron microscope study of the development of the human respiratory acinus. Thorax. 1984;39(10):733–42.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Everard ML. Inhalation therapy for infants. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(7):869–78.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Amirav I, Newhouse MT. Aerosol therapy in infants and toddlers: past, present and future. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2008;2(5):597–605.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Amirav I, Newhouse MT. Deposition of small particles in the developing lung. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2012;13(2):73–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Schuepp KG, Jauernig J, Janssens HM, et al. In vitro determination of the optimal particle size for nebulized aerosol delivery to infants. J Aerosol Med. 2005;18(2):225–35.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kohler E, Jilg G, Avenarius S, Jorch G. Lung deposition after inhalation with various nebulisers in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(4):F275–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fok TF, Monkman S, Dolovich M, et al. Efficiency of aerosol medication delivery from a metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996;21(5):301–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sood BG, Peterson J, Malian M, et al. Jet nebulization of prostaglandin E1 during neonatal mechanical ventilation: stability, emitted dose and aerosol particle size. Pharmacol Res. 2007;56(6):531–41.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fink JB. Delivery of inhaled drugs for infants and small children: a commentary on present and future needs. Clin Ther. 2012;34(11):S36–45.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ballard J, Lugo RA, Salyer JW. A survey of albuterol administration practices in intubated patients in the neonatal intensive care unit. Respir Care. 2002;47(1):31–8.
PubMed Google Scholar
Lugo RA, Kenney JK, Keenan J, Salyer JW, Ballard J, Ward RM. Albuterol delivery in a neonatal ventilated lung model: nebulization versus chlorofluorocarbon- and hydrofluoroalkane-pressurized metered dose inhalers. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2001;31(3):247–54.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fok TF, Lam K, Ng PC, et al. Delivery of salbutamol to nonventilated preterm infants by metered-dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer. Eur Respir J. 1998;12(1):159–64.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Engle WA. Surfactant-replacement therapy for respiratory distress in the preterm and term neonate. Pediatrics. 2008;121(2):419–32.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
El-Gendy N, Kaviratna A, Berkland C, Dhar P. Delivery and performance of surfactant replacement therapies to treat pulmonary disorders. Ther Deliv. 2013;4(8):951–80.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sweet DG, Halliday HL. The use of surfactants in 2009. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2009;94(3):78–83.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nimmo AJ, Carstairs JR, Patole SK, Whitehall J, Davidson K, Vink R. Intratracheal administration of glucocorticoids using surfactant as a vehicle. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002;29(8):661–5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hughes WT, Sillos EM, LaFon S, et al. Effects of aerosolized synthetic surfactant, atovaquone, and the combination of these on murine Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 1998;177(4):1046–56.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van’t Veen A, Mouton JW, Gommers D, Lachmann B. Pulmonary surfactant as vehicle for intratracheally instilled tobramycin in mice infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;119(6):1145–8.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Yeh TF, Lin HC, Chang CH, et al. Early intratracheal instillation of budesonide using surfactant as a vehicle to prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants: a pilot study. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):e1310–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ari A, Restrepo RD. Aerosol delivery device selection for spontaneously breathing patients: 2012. Respir Care. 2012;57(4):613–26.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Iles R, Lister P, Edmunds AT. Crying significantly reduces absorption of aerosolised drug in infants. Arch Dis Child. 1999;81(2):163–5.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Murakami G, Igarashi T, Adachi Y, et al. Measurement of bronchial hyperreactivity in infants and preschool children using a new method. Ann Allergy. 1990;64(4):383–7.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moss ML. The veloepiglottic sphincter and obligate nose breathing in the neonate. J Pediatr. 1965;67(2):330–1.
Article Google Scholar
Djupesland PG, Skretting A, Winderen M, Holand T. Bi-directional nasal delivery of aerosols can prevent lung deposition. J Aerosol Med. 2004;17(3):249–59.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guerin C, Fassier T, Bayle F, Lemasson S, Richard JC. Inhaled bronchodilator administration during mechanical ventilation: how to optimize it, and for which clinical benefit? J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2008;21(1):85–96.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fink JB, Dhand R, Duarte AG, Jenne JW, Tobin MJ. Aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation. An in vitro model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(2 Pt 1):382–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hess DR, Dillman C, Kacmarek RM. In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation: pressure-control vs. volume control ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(7):1145–50.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mazela J, Polin RA. Aerosol delivery to ventilated newborn infants: historical challenges and new directions. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170(4):433–44.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Diot P, Morra L, Smaldone GC. Albuterol delivery in a model of mechanical ventilation. Comparison of metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer efficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(4 Pt 1):1391–4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fink JB, Dhand R, Grychowski J, Fahey PJ, Tobin MJ. Reconciling in vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-enhancing factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):63–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sood BG, Latif Z, Shen Y, et al. Aerosol delivery during high frequency jet ventilation: an MRI evaluation. Respir Care. 2012;57(11):1901–7.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Baleine J, Milesi C, Mesnage R, et al. Intubation in the delivery room: experience with nasal midazolam. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90(1):39–43.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sharma R, Harish R. Comparative study on the efficacy of intranasal midazolam vs intravenous midazolam in convulsing neonates and children. Res Rev J Med Health Sci. 2013;2(4):54–7.
Google Scholar
Chiaretti A, Barone G, Rigante D, et al. Intranasal lidocaine and midazolam for procedural sedation in children. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(2):160–3.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Keane EF. Another way to administer antiepileptic medications in infants and children. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1993;18(5):270–4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Graves NM, Kriel RL. Rectal administration of antiepileptic drugs in children. Pediatr Neurol. 1987;3(6):321–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van Lingen RA, Deinum JT, Quak JM, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of rectally administered paracetamol in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80(1):F59–63.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Anderson BJ, Holford NH, Woolard GA. Paracetamol kinetics in neonates. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1997;25:721–2.
Google Scholar
Hopkins CS, Underhill S, Booker PD. Pharmacokinetics of paracetamol after cardiac surgery. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65(9):971–6.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Keinanen S, Hietula M, Simila S, Kouvalainen K. Antipyretic therapy. Comparison of rectal and oral paracetamol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;12(1):77–80.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Arana A, Morton NS, Hansen TG. Treatment with paracetamol in infants. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(1):20–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Anderson BJ, Woollard GA, Holford NH. A model for size and age changes in the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol in neonates, infants and children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50(2):125–34.
Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zuo XC, Ng CM, Barrett JS, et al. Effects of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in Chinese adult renal transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2013;23(5):251–61.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Slomkowski S, Aleman JV, Gilbert RG, et al. Terminology of polymers and polymerization processes in dispersed systems (IUPAC recommendations 2011). Pure Appl Chem. 2011;83(12):2229–59.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Amirav I, Newhouse MT, Luder A, Halamish A, Omar H, Gorenberg M. Feasibility of aerosol drug delivery to sleeping infants: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3):e004124.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Dvorak M. Medicine dispensing pacifier. US Patent 5,512,047; 1996.
Noble DE. Medication dispensing pacifier. US Patent 5,078,734; 1992.
Luehne-Porath L. Medicine dispensing pacifier. US Patent D445,902; 2001.
Dumont KE, Dumont D. Medication dispensing pacifier. US Patent D476,085; 2003.
Brenner V. Infant medicine dispenser. US Patent 2,013,009,0595; 2013.
Walsh J, Bickmann D, Breitkreutz J, Chariot-Goulet M. Delivery devices for the administration of paediatric formulations: overview of current practice, challenges and recent developments. Int J Pharm. 2011;415(1–2):221–31.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kraus DM, Stohlmeyer LA, Hannon PR, Freels SA. Effectiveness and infant acceptance of the Rx medibottle versus the oral syringe. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21(4):416–23.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Purswani MU, Radhakrishnan J, Irfan KR, Walter-Glickman C, Hagmann S, Neugebauer R. Infant acceptance of a bitter-tasting liquid medication: a randomized controlled trial comparing the Rx medibottle with an oral syringe. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(2):186–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Foinard A, Decaudin B, Barthelemy C, Debaene B, Odou P. Prevention of drug delivery disturbances during continuous intravenous infusion: an in vitro study on a new multi-lumen infusion access device. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2013;32(9):e107–12.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Report of the informal expert meeting on dosage forms of medicines for children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
Google Scholar
Kayitare E, Vervaet C, Ntawukulilyayo JD, Seminega B, Bortel V, Remon JP. Development of fixed dose combination tablets containing zidovudine and lamivudine for paediatric applications. Int J Pharm. 2009;370(1–2):41–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Laulicht B, Langer R, Karp JM. Quick-release medical tape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(46):18803–8.
Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
Huang NN, High RH. Comparison of serum levels following the administration of oral and parenteral preparations of penicillin to infants and children of various age groups. J Pediatr. 1953;42(6):657–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Page 2
From: Challenges Associated with Route of Administration in Neonatal Drug Delivery
Oral | Stomach pH | At birth: more basic within 24 h Postnatal: approximately adult levels (1–3) 1 week postnatal: more basic | Weakly basic drugs will have increased bioavailability in basic stomach environment, while weakly acidic drugs will have decreased bioavailability | [8–11, 13, 14, 143] |
Gastric emptying | Reduced | Decreased absorption rate | [9, 15, 16] | |
Intestinal surface area | Reduced | Decreased absorption | [9] | |
Intestinal motility and peristalsis | Reduced | Increased absorption | [15, 26] | |
Intestinal P-gp expression | Reduced | Increased absorption | [29] | |
Intestinal CYP metabolism | Varied depending on CYP, but decreased in most cases | Depends on CYP, but often increased bioavailability due to decreased metabolism | [30–33, 35] | |
Intravenous | Blood volume | Reduced | Limitation to carrier flow rate for IV fluids | [15, 52, 54] |
Intramuscular | Muscle mass | Reduced | Restricts options for IM delivery | [15, 69, 70] |
Muscle vascularization | Variable | Can result in reductions or fluctuations of IM drug reaching systemic circulation | [69] | |
Subcutaneous | Subcutaneous fat | Reduced | Can result in drug leaking from depot | [15, 80] |
Topical and transdermal | Stratum corneum thickness | <35 weeks’ gestation: reduced ≥35 weeks’ gestation: approximately adult thickness | Increased systemic bioavailability for neonates <35 weeks’ gestational age | [81] |
Stratum corneum hydration | Increased | Increased bioavailability for most hydrophilic drugs | [12, 82] | |
Surface area to bodyweight ratio | Increased | Increased bioavailability | [12, 82] | |
Intrapulmonary | Lung branching and development | Immature | Unclear, potentially decreased lower lung deposition/bioavailability | [86, 87] |
Inspiratory flow and volume | Decreased | Reduced likelihood of upper airway impaction, potential for increased bioavailability | [87] | |
Rectal | Size of rectum | Reduced | Potential for reduced bioavailability due to inability to avoid portal absorption | [123] |
- IV intravenous, IM intramuscular, P-gp P-glycoprotein, CYP cytochrome P450