Have you heard, "The patient is unconscious, breathing, and talking" and thought, "Huh?"
AVPU (pronounced as ave poo) or the AVPU scale — a tool used to assess the patient's brain perfusion and function — describes a patient's level of consciousness. All healthcare providers, including EMTs, doctors, nurses and paramedics, use AVPU to assess and monitor a patient's brain function.
What does AVPU mean?
A = Awake. The patient is Awake
V = Verbal. The patient responds to a Verbal stimulus
P = Pain. The patient responds to a Pain stimulus
U = Unresponsive. The patient is Unresponsive to stimulus
The distinction between 'A' and 'V' frequently causes confusion.
You are awake on AVPU scale
If you are reading this article, you are 'A' on AVPU. You might be awake and confused, awake and disoriented, awake and lethargic, or awake and oriented. Those descriptors for awake, such as confused or disoriented, describe your mental status.
Awake patients are always conscious and some adjective that describes their mental status of being awake.
Being Not Awake is unconscious
A patient that is not awake is unconscious. A patient who is unconscious is V, P, or U on the AVPU scale.
A patient that is 'V' responds to a verbal stimulus provided by responders.
Have you ever yelled, "DUDE, wake up!" to an intoxicated patient (or friend) and they raised their eyes, looked at you, or somehow responded to your voice? They are responding to a verbal stimulus.
If the patient responds, "Why are you yelling at me?" the patient is 'A' or Awake.
A patient that is 'V' cannot be alert, answer SAMPLE history questions, describe their chief complaint or make an informed decision about refusing care.
Interpreting a pain stimulus
If the patient doesn't respond to a verbal stimulus attempt a pain stimulus with a pinch, squeeze or sternum rub.
A sternum rub is the application of a painful stimulus with the knuckles of a closed fist to the center chest of a patient who is not alert and does not respond to verbal stimuli. The sternum rub is the most common painful stimulus practiced in the field by EMTs and paramedics. However, it is possible to misinterpret the patient’s response to the stimuli depending on the duration the pressure is applied.
Learn how to correctly apply and interpret a sternum rub.
Glasgow Coma Scale
An alternative to the AVPU scale to assess a patient's level of consciousness is the Glasgow Coma Scale.
How to use AVPU
Knowing the patient's level of consciousness - A, V, P, or U - is the beginning of an investigation. If the patient is awake and has altered mental status use the focused history (SAMPLE, OPQRST) and physical exam to determine why. Does the patient have low blood sugar, other symptoms of a stroke, or signs of a narcotics overdose?
For a patient who is V, P, or U, there is increased urgency to determine the cause and provide treatment. For example, a patient who is unconscious may not be able to control their own airway. Seek out a cause and provide treatment within your scope of practice.
Finally, reassess AVPU during treatment and transport. Monitoring AVPU and other vital signs will help determine if the patient is improving, worsening or responding to treatment.
This article, originally published 8/18/2009, has been updated with additional information.
Granja C, Lopes A, Moreira S, et al. Patients’ recollections of experiences in the intensive care unit may affect their quality of life. Crit Care. 2005;9(2):R96–109.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gelinas C. Management of pain in cardiac surgery ICU patients: have we improved over time? Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2007;23(5):298–303.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Zetterlund P, Plos K, Bergbom I, et al. Memories from intensive care unit persist for several years—a longitudinal prospective multi-centre study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2012;28(3):159–67.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Russell S. An exploratory study of patients’ perceptions, memories and experiences of an intensive care unit. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(4):783–91.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cullen L, Greiner J, Titler MG. Pain management in the culture of critical care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2001;13(2):151–66.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dale CR, Kannas DA, Fan VS, et al. Improved analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol associated with decreased duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(3):367–74.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lindenbaum L, Milia DJ. Pain management in the ICU. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(6):1621–36.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Chanques G, Viel E, Constantin JM, et al. The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales. Pain. 2010;151(3):711–21.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Puntillo KA, Morris AB, Thompson CL, et al. Pain behaviors observed during six common procedures: results from Thunder Project II. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(2):421–7.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mateo OM, Krenzischek DA. A pilot study to assess the relationship between behavioral manifestations and self-report of pain in postanesthesia care unit patients. J Post Anesth Nurs. 1992;7(1):15–21.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li D, Puntillo K, Miaskowski C. A review of objective pain measures for use with critical care adult patients unable to self-report. J Pain. 2008;9(1):2–10.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL, et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(12):2258–63.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gelinas C, Fortier M, Viens C, et al. Pain assessment and management in critically ill intubated patients: a retrospective study. Am J Crit Care. 2004;13(2):126–35.
PubMed Google Scholar
Liu Y, Li L, Herr K. Evaluation of two observational pain assessment tools in Chinese critically ill patients. Pain Med. 2015;16(8):1622–8.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ahlers SJ, van Gulik L, van der Veen AM, et al. Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R15.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, et al. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):420–7.
PubMed Google Scholar
Aissaoui Y, Zeggwagh AA, Zekraoui A, et al. Validation of a behavioral pain scale in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(5):1470–6.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Jeitziner MM, Schwendimann R, Hamers JP, et al. Assessment of pain in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients: an observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(5):645–54.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(7):1325–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257–68.
PubMed Google Scholar
Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279–82.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263–306.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Gelinas C, Puntillo KA, Joffe AM, et al. A validated approach to evaluating psychometric properties of pain assessment tools for use in nonverbal critically ill adults. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;34(2):153–68.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pudas-Tahka SM, Axelin A, Aantaa R, et al. Pain assessment tools for unconscious or sedated intensive care patients: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(5):946–56.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Puntillo K, Pasero C, Li D, et al. Evaluation of pain in ICU patients. Chest. 2009;135(4):1069–74.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rijkenberg S, Stilma W, Endeman H, et al. Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. J Crit Care. 2015;30(1):167–72.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Page 2
Facial Expression | Facial Expression | |||||
Relaxed | 1 | Relaxed, neutral | 0 | 1 | ||
Partially Tightened | 2 | Tense | 1 | 3 | ||
Fully tightened Grimacing | 3 or 4 | Grimacing | 2 | 5 or 6 | ||
Upper Limb Movement | Body Movement | Muscle Tension | ||||
No movement | 1 | Absence of movements | 0 | Relaxed | 0 | 1 |
Partially bent | 2 | Protection | 0 or 1 | Tense, rigid | 0 or 1 | 3 or 4 |
Fully bent with finger flexion Permanently retracted | 3 or 4 | Restlessness | 0, 1, or 2 | Very tense, or rigid | 0, 1, or 2 | 5, 6, 7, or 8 |
Ventilator Compliance | Ventilator Compliance | |||||
Tolerating movement | 1 | Tolerating ventilator | 0 | 1 | ||
Coughing but tolerating for the most of time | 2 | Coughing but tolerating | 1 | 3 | ||
Fighting ventilator Unable to control ventilation | 3 or 4 | Fighting ventilator | 2 | 5 or 6 |
- The table shows the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) (first column), the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) scores (second column), and the BPS and CPOT combination score (third column). The individual BPS and CPOT scores for each raw were summed. The BPS and CPOT combination score was obtained from the individual BPS and CPOT combination score from each raw. This combined BPS and CPOT score ranges from 3 to 20