Some technologies such as telehealth encounters may present barriers to active listening.

  1. Claxton G, Rae M, Long M, Damico A, Whitmore H. Health benefits in 2018: Modest growth in premiums, higher worker contributions at firms with more low-wage workers. Health Aff. 2018; doi:https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.1001

  2. Barnett ML, Ray KN, Souza J, Mehrotra A. Trends in Telemedicine Use in a Large Commercially Insured Population, 2005-2017. JAMA. 2018; doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12354

  3. COVID-19 TELEHEALTH COVERAGE POLICIES | CCHP Website. Accessed April 13, 2020. https://www.cchpca.org/resources/covid-19-telehealth-coverage-policies

  4. Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. Covid-19 and Health Care’s Digital Revolution. N Engl J Med. 2020; doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005835

  5. Mehrotra A, Ray K, Brockmeyer DM, Barnett ML, Bender JA. Rapidly Converting to “Virtual Practices”: Outpatient Care in the Era of Covid-19. NEJM Catal. 2020; doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.20.0091

  6. Top Healthy Industry Issues of 2020: Will Digital Start to Show an ROI; 2019.

  7. Hollander JE, Sites FD. The Transition from Reimagining to Recreating Health Care Is Now. 2020;(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.20.0093

  8. ATA to Providers: Use Telehealth to Compete Against Retail Clinics. Accessed April 13, 2020. https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/ata-to-providers-use-telehealth-to-compete-against-retail-clinics

  9. Flannery D, Jarrin R. Building a regulatory and payment framework flexible enough to withstand technological progress. Health Aff. 2018; doi:https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05151

  10. Cavanagh S. Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurs Res. 1997;4(3):5-16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kondracki NL, Wellman NS, Amundson DR. Content Analysis : Review of Methods and Their Applications. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002;34(4):224-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. In: The Sociology of Health and Illness: A Reader; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315013015-30

  15. Murray E, Pollack L, White M, Lo B. Clinical decision-making: Patients’ preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.007

  16. Krupinski E, Dimmick S, Grigsby J, et al. Research recommendations for the American Telemedicine Association. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(5):579-589. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.12.579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ray KN, Demirci JR, Bogen DL, Mehrotra A, Miller E. Optimizing Telehealth Strategies for Subspecialty Care: Recommendations from Rural Pediatricians. Published online 2015; doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0186

  18. Uscher-Pines L, Kahn JM. Barriers and Facilitators to Pediatric Emergency Telemedicine in the United States. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0015

  19. Jain T, Schwarz EB, Mehrotra A. A study of telecontraception. N Engl J Med. 2019; doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1907545


Page 2

From: Delivering Urgent Care Using Telemedicine: Insights from Experienced Clinicians at Academic Medical Centers

Characteristic Study group (n = 20)
Age, mean (SD) 43.9 (8.9)
Gender, no. (%)
Male 2 (10)
Female 17 (90)
Race, no. (%)
White 11 (61)
African American 5 (28)
Asian 2 (11)
Declined to respond 2 (11)
Region of practice, no. (%)
Midwest 1 (5)
Northeast 18 (90)
South 1 (5)
Specialty, no. (%)
Family medicine 10 (50)
medicine 5 (25)
pediatrics 5 (25)
Occupation, no. (%)
Nurse practitioner 13 (65)
Physician 6 (30)
Physician assistant 1 (5)
Years in clinical practice, mean (SD) 9.7 (9.2)

This process has changed a lot over centuries; people do not communicate the same ways. The Internet access is a good indicator of this change because it allows people to communicate in many different ways such as social networks, email, or video calls (Skype). According to the INSEE, the number of French households with an access to the Internet grew from 12 % to 64 % in ten years.

The first reason why new technologies dismiss social relationships is because more technologies mean less face-to-face and therefore less communication. Most of digital technologies such as the Internet, cellphones, television, and video games feature screens, which people use to communicate. According to Krystel Tong’s presentation, 57 per cent of people are more likely to communicate online rather than by face-to-face. However, tone and body language are key points of communication, therefore this lack of face-to-face communication can lead to misunderstandings. According the BBC news, for some people this lack of interaction also creates a feeling of isolation. A survey done by researchers from University of Michigan showed that the more people use Facebook the more they feel lonely and deserted. For some other people, new technologies can contribute to people acting violently. As Leo Kelion reported, in August 2013, Hannah Smith, a British teenager aged 14 killed herself after being persecuted for months on the social network, ask.com.